Tag Archives: Canada
Olympic Fever

Olympic Fever

I’ve never really been one to watch the Olympic games in all honestly, I found them boring as a child, I’d much rather have seen what Bugs Bunny was up to or tuned into Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles…you know, things with real passion eh? However, this year I actually sat down and watched the opening ceremonies, and from that moment on I was stuck on the Olympics.

            I don’t know how many other people across Canada alone got the ‘Olympic fever’ but this year for some reason I got it bad. Every morning as I got ready for work I would turn on the TV to the same channel and the journalists would wake up with me. Every evening I’d come home from work or class and I’d tune in to see what events had taken place and what was going on that night. I’d receive texts from my Mom periodically each day updating me on our metal count and what races we’d won in. It was just something outside of my own little world of crazy school and work life that I could sit down, relax and be excited for…and it didn’t hurt that I could actually do school work while watching it (I mean really, I was mostly interested in the Canadian athletes, or on occasion those athletes they did those little pre-game life stories on), so during other athletes’ runs I’d read my textbook…you know how student life is.

            I started looking forward every day to events I would watch in the evening and have people come over to watch anything really, curling, skating, and of course hockey! It didn’t really matter what we watched, we just loved seeing our athletes compete and really took pride in the metals won as though they were our own (I love living vicariously though athletes…makes me feel like I never have to go to the gym).

            The day I found out that the Olympics were ending however a wave of sadness washed over me briefly, I thought to myself, who will wake up with me in the morning? How will I deal with the lack of texts from my Mom? How will I decide what to watch on those nights when there’s no good shows on TV? But I made it though, and although the closing ceremonies were emotional for me, I held to one thing…we kicked butt in both women’s and men’s hockey!

Vancouver 2010: The Good, The Bad; The Olympics.

Vancouver 2010: The Good, The Bad; The Olympics.

From the 2:30 mark, “The International Olympic Committee has the honor of announcing that the 21st Olympic games in 2010 are awarded to the city of….(dramatic pause)….Vancouver.”

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpSqv1jx-8M]

I still remember ducking out of my hated construction labor job for 20 minutes in July of 2003; strategically hiding from my boss, taking refuge in my car which I parked out of plain view, reclining the seat and turning up the radio to hear the announcement being broadcast on a local station.  My hair stood straight up and chills ran down my spine when IOC President Jacques Rogge finally said “Vancouver.”  Unfortunately I had to go back to hating my job and life prompty after that, but they were 20 minutes I’ll never forget.  I still get those same chills even when I remember back to it now.  For seven years, I’ve been excited for Vancouver, and Canada, to host these winter Olympics.  I know I’m not the only one either.

An event like the Olympics effects not only one entire nation, but the entire world.  Anytime things of that magnitude occur, opposition naturally follows.  And that’s part of the beauty of our democratic societies; that we allow free speech, and people have the right to balk at things they believe are worth standing against.  Are there bad things that will come out of Canada hosting the games?  Surely.  The $500 million+ dollars pumped into these games could’ve been spent a lot of other ways; especially amongst a recovering economic recession.  Would we have ended homelessness in our country with that money?  Tough to say.  Were we not careful enough with the environment when constructing facilities?  Did we not represent the Indigenous people of Canada, and our other cultural origins correctly?  Did we go overboard on security in an attempt to keep terrorism and other threats to peace out of the picture?  Are there another 100 things that were not done to the liking of our 30 million residents?  Probably.  Is anyone actually making the case that we did things perfect?  Not likely.  Sometimes athletes cheat, sometimes there’s corruption in the IOC.  Sometimes they get away with it, sometimes they don’t.  Some countries get more money to train, and some have to just make due.  Personally, I don’t like the fact that our politicans and corporate sponsors ALL managed to get prime tickets to ALL the events, and the public was subject to an inane online lottery system.  Oh, and that some of those tickets cost $1000 or more.  Athletes get hurt, and probably more unfortunate than anything else, sometimes athletes are fatally injured; as in the case of Georgian Luger, Nodar Kumaritashvili.  So yeah, there’s a lot of imperfect things that the Olympics bring. 

But can we think positively for at least 2 weeks?  If anyone who watched the opening ceremonies that saw the 60,000 Canadians packed into BC Place draped in red and white, waving the Maple Leaf, and resounding in excitement, thinks that Canadians aren’t pleased as punch to be hosting these games, well they couldn’t be more wrong.  For every stick in the mud, there’s an entire tree full of green, growing branches, reaching for the sky and enjoying their time in the sun.  And that’s exactly what Canada has before it; 2+ weeks to shine in international light. 

Canadians love sport, and we love our athletes that compete for us as well.  The thing about athletics is it has the ability to transcend even the thickest cultural and international disagreements in the name of sportsmanlike competition.  If you need any proof of that, look at the nations of Iran and North Korea; absolutely scorned by the Western world as being on the brink of nuclear war with us.  But through all that justified tension, North Korea has sent a speed-skater, and Iran’s sent 2 skiers to compete in the Games; and to, if only briefly, join and be welcomed by the international community.  Even Israel and Lebanon will put aside differences to be a part of the Olympiad.  That’s powerful stuff. 

Look at Ghana, Ethiopia, Nepal, and other impoverished countries that may or may not even see a flake of snow in their countries, but come to the Games with the support of their governments and train between full-time jobs to earn spots on their national rosters to compete because they believe that the Olympics are worth the effort and sacrifice necessary to get to them.  And really, that’s exactly what the Olympics are all about in their purest form; the best amateur athletes in the world, putting aside barriers, competing cleanly, for their country, to showcase the best that their human abilities have to offer in terms of their unique sport. 

The thing is, there’s so much good to be harvested out of such a criticized event.  We ran a little flicker of a flame from Greece, around the entire planet, and through the streets and neighborhoods of nearly every city in our own country.  In Kelowna, we had a kid with cancer cut out a few days of his chemotherapy treatments so he could be a local torchbearer.  Many similarly touching stories laced our national torch relay as well. 

We’ve come together as 6 continents to show that there’s at least one thing we can all be civil and peaceful about, if only for a short time.  The world of sport blends together with art and culture to put on a show unlike any other.  Our troops fighting for our freedom overseas gather around a TV, dressed in Canada clothing and sipping Tim Hortons’ coffee to watch the proceedings of Canadian icons Rick Hansen, Nancy Green, Betty Fox, Wayne Gretzky, and others completing the Olympic opening ceremonies.  We bought pairs of red mittens, various apparel, grocery items, and pretty well anything we could get our hands on that we either knew would support Canadian athletes financially, or just emblazoned “Canada” on them to show our support. 

So, through all the things there are to protest against, there are plenty of others that Canadians are rightfully excited about.  How bananas are we going to all go when a Canadian wins our first gold medal that we’ve ever won on home soil?  Our when our hockey team(s) (hopefully) strike gold as well?  Between the Olympics and Paralympics, it’s going to be an exciting few weeks, and a historical moment for our country.  I hope you choose to enjoy them with the rest of us.  Go Canada go!

read more of Dave at Serenity Now… The SDC Blogs http://davecunning.wordpress.com

No Hockey Rivalry Rivals the Battle Between Crosby and Ovechkin.

No Hockey Rivalry Rivals the Battle Between Crosby and Ovechkin.

There are battles of Alberta, Summit Series’, and “Magnificence” vs “Greatness”; but is there an NHL rivalry greater than the current individualistic battle between Sidney Crosby and Alexander Ovechkin?

The two phenoms entered the league as at least respectful rivals of each other. Prior to their simultaneous NHL arrivals, they had only ever competed against each other on the international stage, playing for Canada and Russia, respectively.  With cameras and tape recorders rolling, making campy NHL commercials and delivering birthday cakes at the NHL All-Star game together slowly morphed into on-ice physicality and off-ice verbal sparring.  Welcome to the business of “selling” the new NHL to the American market.

It’s a protagonist-antagonist scenario that seems to be inspired by Vince McMahon himself.  In one corner, you have the abrasive, exciting, inimical Ovechkin; equipped with infinite energy and a talent level he must have exchanged his soul for, hailing from Mother Russia, a country that, according to Hollywood, produces more bad guys than perogies.  His opposition, the humble, hard-working, and traditional Crosby; hailing from Canada, playing and interviewing the way the Canadian hockey heroes of the past did before him.  Of course, as the NHL panders to the North American market, it’s easy to portray Crosby as the “good guy”, though Ovechkin, Federov, and every other Russian NHL star has been adorned in their homeland.  Most Canadian fans would likely admit that there’s Russian NHL’ers that are better than Canadian NHL’ers, but they’d feel like they were betraying their country if they ever uttered it publicly.

Forget all the media hoopla; shouldn’t the NHL be sending royalties to the parents of Sidney and Alexander for deciding to have children that grew up to capture the attention of their entire audience?  In the ongoing battle to procure American advertisers and cable network broadcasters, the NHL can count on at least Penguins and Capitals games as easy ratings sells; providing that Crosby and Ovechkin are in the lineup.  Did anyone care about the Capitals before Alexander the Great?  A team with no Stanley Cups, and nothing more than a conference championship in 1997-98, former Hart and Art Ross Trophy Winner Jaromir Jagr couldn’t even make hockey exciting in Washington.  All of a sudden, the Verizon Center has sell-out crowds, and the team is a contender.  Ovechkin plays with a wreckless abandon that has resulted in a kneeing suspension, but what is coach Bruce Boudreau going to do with his star, bench him?  Tell him to ease up?  Come on.  The Penguins at least got to pair Lemieux and Crosby together in 2006, but the Steel-Town had been pretty dismal since the back-to-back Stanley Cup championships in 1990-92.  Sure hockey’s a team game, but to suggest that the individual ability and rivalry of Crosby and Ovechkin isn’t largely responsible for the teams’ success and the league’s rising interest, is naive.

The 2008-09 playoffs were an absolute treat to watch, and many people would point to the Pens/Caps Eastern Conference showdown as a highlight, as well as an indication of who would/did become the eventual Cup winner.  Fans got to see Sid and Ovie go at each other for seven consecutive games rather than once a season, and they got to see both players at the top of their respective games; Game 2 featured both players notching hat tricks, and Sid’s 13 series’ points and Ovie’s 14 equaled the highest single-series point total since the 1995 NHL playoffs.  It was awesome.

Penguins win the series 4-3, and the “evil” Ovechkin, was banished back to Russia (well, Washington), screaming promises of revenge (actually he wished that the Pens win the Cup, but just work with me) while he was being dragged away. Meanwhile, the “heroic” Crosby was adorned on a mountain top, cape waving, a dark curl dangling from mid-brow (just above his perv-stache), all while giving an interview where he characteristically puts over his opponents, commenting on how well they played, and not giving himself any selfish credit. Wouldn’t it have been great/justified if he had finally just snapped, either after that series or after winning the Cup, and said, “YOU SEE?!?! I AM BETTER THAN HIM!!”

Ovechkin wins rookie of the year, Sid’s named the youngest captain in history.  Sid wins the Art Ross and the Hart, Ovie wins the Richard and Pearson awards.  And so they dance.  We’re still waiting to see what Ovechkin’s equal to Sid’s Cup win will be.  Alexander’s pursuit of a championship, Sidney’s defence of his, and their continued rivalry will continually be fun to watch, and is easily the best rivalry in the NHL today.  It’s Canada vs. Russia, tradition vs. new school, team vs. team, and man vs. man, all wrapped into one ongoing showdown.  If the NHL can’t sell that to Americans, then tearing fans away from the baseball diamond and football field for the hockey rink is a fruitless endeavor anyways.

 

 

 

 

read more of Dave at Serenity Now… The SDC Blogs http://davecunning.wordpress.com

Climate Change, Anyone?

Written by: John Coleman

Originally posted on Campus Intel on December 20, 2009

            If you missed what was happening in Copenhagen over the past two weeks, or just chose not to get caught up in the bureaucracy of international politics, here is a brief summary of the 2009 Copenhagen Summit on Climate Change.

            As to be expected, inner-room politics between superpowers China and the United States ran wild throughout the summit. On one hand, China insists on being able follow their own sovereign agenda, which consists of slashing production related carbon emissions by 40 to 45 per cent. Singing a more worldly tune, the US wants to see China, and the rest of the world, follow universal guidelines. Only then will they provide funding to developing nations.

            This funding from the US will be a $100 billion donation to the poorest of developing nations. The United Nations Group of 77, a coalition of developing countries united through common economic and political interests, represents these developing nations, and was also present at Copenhagen. The biggest concern of the G77 is how costly cutting emissions will be for many of its nations. So, the money offered by the US is essential for progress.

            However, support for developing nations has relevance aside from economic woes. It is predicted that developing nations will produce the most carbon emissions in coming years due to mass industrialization, an issue the world’s economic forerunners made into a topic of interest during many negotiations at Copenhagen.

            Canada, members of the UK, and other developed nations kept relatively silent while their wealthy partner-nations did most of the talking. It is hard to say why. Perhaps because China and the US are the two nations expected to take on the biggest financial role in reducing world emissions, and piping up now could mean signing a massive cheque.

            Interestingly enough, Canada’s down-low persona in Copenhagen could also be due to its image as having the worst target for reducing emissions amongst industrialized nations. When Prime Minister Stephen Harper did speak, he simply insisted that Canada would follow suit with America’s strategy. The US says it will reduce its carbon emissions by 17 per cent from its 2005 level by 2020.

            The Copenhagen Summit is the latest in a series of world meetings on climate change since the Kyoto Protocol was created in Kyoto, Japan, in 1997. The Kyoto Protocol is a protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, and acts as an international treaty, binding all nations who sign to combat climate change following its guidelines. Many see the Kyoto Protocol as the best solution for climate change because it is designed to force the world’s largest industrialized nations to reduce carbon emissions, while still allowing economic growth and sustainability in developing nations. Aside from a few, every nation on earth has ratified the Kyoto Protocol. Among developed nations, the US is the only nation to declare no intention of doing so.

            After Copenhagen, the results are grim. It is estimated that, at current reduction attempts put forth by all nations present at the summit, carbon emissions will still increase the world’s climate by 3 degrees Celsius. This is enough to put the world at catastrophic risk of widespread flooding, tyrannical weather patterns, and ensuing disease spreading. So, do we really want the next world summit’s slogan to be “Would you like climate change with that?” If our political representatives don’t get a move on with this

I’ll Hands-Free You Right In the Bluetooth If You Don’t Keep That Thing In The Car.

I’ll Hands-Free You Right In the Bluetooth If You Don’t Keep That Thing In The Car.

So as we were all warned, there’s no more cell-phone use allowed while driving in Canada, unless you enjoy being fined around $200.  Well, in most of Canada anyways (BC, Saskatchewan and Ontario are in; Alberta, Manitoba, and the Yukon Territory have laws in the works.  Meanwhile, you can still drive, text and gab all you want in Quebec, the Maritimes, and those crazy, crazy, Northwest Territories).  That is of course, unless you’re equipped with one of the government’s latest mandated cash-grabs (accusation and solid proof pending): the Bluetooth hands-free device.

The gist of the law is that anyone who watches the screen of an electronic device (cellphone, GPS, mp3 player, DVD player, video games, or Sean Avery distracting Martin Brodeur, which also required a new law legislation) while driving violates the law; unless it’s installed correctly, and doesn’t obstruct the driver’s view of the road.  To read the more detailed version of the BC Law, click here.

Now, with all that being said, let’s get to the real issue at hand with this law:

IT SHOULD BE ILLEGAL FOR PEOPLE TO WALK AROUND IN PUBLIC TALKING ON HANDS-FREE DEVICES.

Ok, I get it Government of Canada, you want to keep motorists and pedestrians alike, safe.  Great, good plan.  I appreciate your concern for my well-being.  Honestly, I’m one of the better and safer driving talk and texter’s out there; but I’ll conform for the sake of the greater good.  But for crying out loud, if I have to see one more person walking around talking into thin air, using their outside voice while clearly within hearing and visual range of myself and others, waving both their arms around like they just got their mental institute shackles off, I’m going to grab that little “lifesaver” right off their ear, turn it sideways, and show them where they can stick it: back in their car, so they can put it back on when they start driving again (what did you think I was going to suggest?)

I used to work at a local irrigation supply store in Kelowna, and we had this dealer rep from one of the companies we ordered products from that would regularly drop by our store to visit the owner and talk turkey.  Fine by all accounts;  probably good business and PR.  The only problem was, this larger, portly, balding, booming bass voiced man (my friend and co-worker, Jayson Zilkie pointed out a startling Homer Simpson resemblance) would stroll into our store, mid-conversation, with his hands-free device inserted in his ear, and his speech burrowing into the goodwill-towards-men shield of my rage.

From the moment our door-chime went off, this guy was already 5 sentences deep.  He would come in, flail his arms around, flaunt his apparent ability to solve problems on the spot for everyone in the store to hear, walk a few laps around our store, walk out the back door, come back in, repeat the process, and then one time I seem to recall, he actually left and drove off without ever even actually talking to anyone in our store.  This happened A LOT while I was employed there.  The guy was lucky I didn’t see him pulling that routine after our order of sharp garden tools came in and were displayed near the front desk.

So if you’re one of those people who uses a hands-free device outside of your car, out in public, on display for everyone to see and hear, remember this:

YOU’RE BOTHERING EVERYONE.

 Do us all a favour; disconnect the hands-free when you turn off your car and get out, and if you get a call, talk on the phone, like a normal human being.  We may be thwarting road-rage with this law, but we may also be inventing Bluetooth-rage.  When I got my headset (which I won off the radio for being the first caller), I made a vow to keep that thing in the car at all times.  My suggestion to all of you is that you do the same, for all our sakes.  And your own safety.

read more of Dave at Serenity Now… The SDC Blogs http://davecunning.wordpress.com

Tim Hortons ‘Eh:’ Investigating Canada’s Identity.

Tim Hortons ‘Eh:’ Investigating Canada’s Identity.

I am not sure what word is more prominent throughout Canada – - ‘eh’ or ‘double-double.’ One thing is certain, however, is that one of the most prominent questions circulating around Canada is not only “would you like to add a donut with your coffee for 49 cents” but instead, “Does Canada have an identity?” For that reason, I (as well) have decided to analyze whether Canada has an identity, or whether our identity is merely related to a good cup of steaming coffee.

United States’ identity seems to hang outside every house through the symbolism of their American flag… Comparatively, the only common identifier that indicates, “Welcome to Canada” that is frequently seen would be the many Tim Hortons situated at almost every corner and are continually popping up more and more frequently.

Now if this is the case, what does that say about Canada’s identity? To begin, it is evident that this does highlight how Canada is constantly seeking an identity, and interestingly, it is evident that Tim Hortons and their advertisers are aware of that.  This can be easily recognized in their campaigns and their commercials, as, without fail, they play on a sense of Canadian national pride and identity.  To clarify, students should all remember the commercial with the young student who went to Scotland for university, but wrote to Tim Hortons to have a care package sent to remind her of home. Tim Hortons specifically chose us, the students, as a target audience. They firmly believed that we, as students, like other Canadians, would relate with the notion that Tim Hortons signifies, ‘home,’ and thus, our identity. It’s bewildering if you ask me.

Conversely, I have realized that there is definitely a more specific identity and culture occurring within Canada. Being raised in New Brunswick, a lot of my hometown friends indicated (without hesitation) that Canada has an identity. This is because; many of them have been raised with the important culture emerging from French-Canadians. This is an essential aspect for sure, as they represent approximately 25 percent of Canada’s population. However, that being the case, I am once again led to question…. what about the other 75 percent? Furthermore, a point that my professor made the other day was regarding the fact that more people in Canada speak Cantonese than French. That being the case, shall we expect there to be a Cantonese-Canadian culture emerging in the future?

I strongly believe that the problem lies in the fact that we, as Canadians, try too hard to identify ourselves. (Which, evidently, is the reasoning many people, like myself, prominently question whether there is an identity). After a lot of debate, I eventually drew a conclusion that Canadians, as a whole, are more likely to define themselves as what they are not, rather than what they are. Now I am trying to speculate… why must we define ourselves so negatively?

The most prominent notion of what we are not is that we are…“not American.”  In reality, this is the one fixation that many Canadians will indicate that integrates us together as a nation. Take for example, the popular Molson Canadian ads – the reasoning they became such a success is because it was this exact sense of identity that many Canadians were searching for. It gave Canadians something to relate to and provided the ability for Canadians to distinguish themselves.

But to say we are “not American” what else does that say aside from clarifying that we are aware of what curling is and that we say ‘about’ and not ‘a-boot?’ As an identity, the States have been defined as a melting pot; in which people of all nationalities and cultures are fused to form a unified nation where everyone complies with the same rules and regulations. In contrast, Canada is viewed as being a mosaic, or as someone in my class defined it, as a salad bowl, (different strokes for different folks). Regardless the representation, it symbolizes the fact that Canada supports differences as each individual is invited to join but still keep their own identity, customs and traditions.

I’ve now debated whether Canada is affected by the diverse amount of cultures that join our nation. Have we become a multicultural society where we have lost our own distinct identity or is the fact that we are a multicultural society our identity in itself? When introduced to this debate, my professor, Dr. Anthony Yue, discussed the reality of the hardships that occur due to the difficulties of finding a true dominant culture due to the emergence of many subcultures, but he also further stated that “Canada has become a diverse postmodern nation where nations do not even matter.”                                                 

Overall, perhaps Canada’s identity is our love for Tim Hortons, our national sport of hockey, the Glacier beer, our ski hills, Canada’s natural beauty, our multicultural society, our yummy maple syrup, or even the fact that we are “not American.”

The only thing I am now left pondering is the fact that if that last notion, that we are, “not American” is what we believe, and if we relate it one last time to the first notion, Tim Hortons, what does that indicate? I ask this because I feel many Canadians forget one important that… that Tim Hortons is currently owned by Americans! Anyone have any idea what that is indicating about our nation?

Overall, I think we have to fix the ‘holes’ in our society… not the ‘donuts.

Our Mascots Strong and Free

Our Mascots Strong and Free

Those precious few moments between timeouts and halftimes belong to mascots.  That is their time to shine and no matter the score of the game they have to keep the fans energetic and in the game.   For those of you that have attended any NBA games in Toronto would know that the Raptor is always amongst the best in the league when it comes to entertainment.  Whether it’s high flying acrobatics, play taunting or flirting with the co-eds, mascots are an important part in athletics.

While Canadian universities don’t have near the level of randomness for mascots that our neighbours to the south have (see North Carolina’s School of the Arts Fighting Pickle or Evergreen State’s Geoduck), there are still some fairly odd mascots this side of the border.

Perhaps some of the more random Canadian University/College mascots include:

McFogg the Dog from Simon Fraser University.  This Scottish terrier supposedly took the reins from the school’s former mascot Joe the Gorilla.

- Trent’s “Excali-Bear” a clever little play on the fact they’re called the Excaliburs.  Might’ve made more sense to go with something a little more medieval like Windsor’s “The Lancer” or RMC’s “The Knight”.

- “Monty” the Mountie is the new mascot for Mount Allison Mounties.  A lot of questions still are unanswered at this school.  Rumours swirl that a mountie is a duck, which in that case would make sense as Sackville does have the Marshlands.  Don’t see why they couldn’t just call themselves the Mounties and have an RCMP officer at every game arresting other mascots.

- Laval Rouge et Or is a football powerhouse.  Their mascot however, is some sort of bird that has no dominance over any other mascots from the bird kingdom.  Especially with the name Victor, this bird must get picked on a lot.

Have you seen this Sasquatch?

-  A Sasquatch has been roaming the grounds of Fraser Valley’s campus.  The students and faculty have grown to love him and are now holding a competition to name the school’s newest mascot.

-  Eggy the Ram.  This one is so much random as Ryerson teams are called the Rams.  What’s random is the name, Eggy? Be sure not to mock him though as he’ll be sure to make an example out of you.  The great thing about Eggy is that he is by far the most knowledgeable of the mascots because he can actually type and has his own Facebook and Twitter accounts.

-  Knock knock.  Who’s there? Boo.  Boo Who? Don’t cry Golden Gaels you’re mascot is the winner.  Boo Hoo the bear is perhaps the most random mascot.  Maybe someone could explain why Queen’s has a bear named Boo Hoo for a mascot.  A lackadaisical bear that Winnie the Pooh could smack around doesn’t exactly strike fear into opponents.

Canadians schools are still warming to the idea of mascots and pep rallies.  And while some schools seem lost in a sea of random choices for their mascots others take the easy road, naming their school after an animal with hooves or claws.  Mascots are important to athletics and I would like to take the time to salute all of Canada’s mascots (at least the ones that have some online proof they exist).  Here’s to you:

GUBA and Patches from Alberta, Bailey the Brandon Bobcat, Rex the Dino, Luxie the Pronghorn, Billy the Bison, Reggie the Regina cougar, Saskatchewan’s Howler, Wes-Lee Coyote, Boomer the Badger, Western the Mustang, Gee Gee the Horse, Rodney Raven, Gryph from Guelph, Wolfie, Voyageur, GoldenHawk, Mac, Toronto’s True Blue, The Hunter, King Warrior, The Lancer, Marty the Martlet, York Lion, Concordia’s Buzz, Dalhousie Tiger, Tommie, St. Mary’s Husky, The Cape Breton Highlander and Sammy the Sea Hawk.

Let the Silver Slide; Canada’s Still Great

Let the Silver Slide; Canada’s Still Great

Oh no! Panic! Chaos! Pandemonium! Canada loses the gold medal (no, didn’t win the silver) at the World Junior Championships and breaks the 5 in row run, nixing the “Blitz for 6” (copyright me, just made it up, never heard it before)!  Canada needs to re-evaluate its hockey program before we are overtaken by the world at the only thing we try really hard to be known to be good at if we are to rebound from this travesty! Run for your lives!!

Isn’t it absurd the amount of pressure we Canadians put on our hockey players; in particular, our nation’s best hockey players under the age of 20?  Yeah, Canada’s really good at hockey.  No one contends that.  But players playing at the CHL level, many drafted by NHL teams and being groomed to compete at the highest pro level in the world some day, good enough to represent their country, at a world championship tournament in their country… I don’t care how much training you’ve had, how many sports psychologists you’ve seen, how many stress channeling activities you’ve tried; somewhere along the line, the load on their backs has to get mighty heavy.  It’s a lot to balance on the mind of a teenager who’s also got homework to deal with, trying to figure out how to ask out that cute girl in his math class, and how to get rid of the pimples on his face; all when he gets home after having the ENTIRE COUNTRY watch and scrutinize him over the Christmas holidays.  It’s great that our national hockey program demands excellence, but at the same time it’s a shame that these boys have been programmed to believe that 2nd place is unacceptable. 

Case in point, Canada’s Jordan Eberle, whose rights are owned by the Edmonton Oilers, became Canada’s all-time leading scorer at the tournament, scored 2 goals in less than 5 minutes to tie the game and send it into overtime, and wins the tournament MVP.  The US team won the tournament in Saskatoon (Eberle plays for Regina).  Despite all the accolades and the crowd chanting his name (very rare in hockey), Eberle mentioned in an interview, “It’s not easy sitting on that blue-line and not hearing your anthem…”  I can’t say I blame him.  In fact, from experience, I agree with him.  It was very easy to tell that the last thing that he, and every other Canadian player wanted to do was stick around the arena while the Americans were parading around with THEIR gold medals.  They were super classy about it, but man, I could see it in their eyes that they were looking for the first exit out of there available to them. 

I’m not saying that Eberle or any of Team Canada should have been all smiley and excited; I’m merely making an observation on how lofty acceptance is for our country to obtain when it comes to hockey.  I can’t remember who said it, but before the tournament, one of the Canadian sports broadcasters made an interesting point to the tune of he hopes the best for Canada, but feels bad for the Canadian team that will inevitably lose somewhere down the line and break the championship streak.  Oops.  But the point of the comment was that, though it’s not at all, anything besides gold is a disappointment for Canada.  The current roster of Team Canada should feel nothing but proud of what they accomplished this year—even if they did concede to our arch-rivals, the Americans.  2nd place on the planet for your age group is still really good.  

Until these kids get to the NHL (some of them certainly will), they need they national pressure on them cranked down a bunch of notches.  When they become professionals that need to sell the game through their play as a product to fans, TV networks, and advertisers, then let them feel the heat.  You can very well make the argument that it benefits the players that are “on their way” to the NHL to face this sort of pressure early on in their careers.  But until that pro contract is signed, lets be proud of the athletes that are selected to wear our country’s flag on their chest; but lets also continue to be the already existing support group of family, friends, and fans that recognize their incredible efforts on the world stage, and help them to know that we don’t see them as failures in the least.  Great work this year boys, we’ll get ‘em next year, on their home turf!

read more of Dave at Serenity Now… The SDC Blogs http://davecunning.wordpress.com