Christopher White is the founder of the Facebook group Canadians Against Proroguing Parliament. When I first wrote about prorogation last week, the Facebook group had a little more than 130,000 members. As of tonight, the group has more than 200,000 members. More and more people are starting to pay attention and starting to get involved, and consequently, are starting to hold their government accountable. Last week, I had the opportunity to interview Christopher about his Facebook group, and to discuss the effect of social media on the prorogation controversy.
SOCIAL MEDIA FOR SOCIAL CAUSES
Within the past couple of years, we have witnessed how social media can be used for social causes at an international level (e.g., Iranian election protests). Now we get a chance to see it in action in our own country. Several classic qualities of groups rallied around social media are present, including self-organizing and self-moderating behaviour, as well as unity under a clear and common cause.
On Saturday, January 23rd, rallies will be taking place all across Canada in opposition to prorogation. Shiloh Davis, founder of another anti-prorogue group, is spearheading the national level coordination for the protests. She started her own group at around the same time that Christopher started his, and the two began communicating and organizing only hours after that. Now there are over 35 communities that are going to participate, and all of them have their own groups and organizations. “It’s very decentralized,” Christopher explained, “The goal was to get people involved in politics.” And the fact that the many groups do not have a central head to dictate how to do things, but instead is self-organized by the initiative of its own members, demonstrates how successful the groups were at engaging people from all across Canada.
What’s also interesting about these Facebook groups, from a social psychological perspective, is their ability to moderate themselves with little or no intervention. Normally, in groups, people tend to shift towards a more extreme attitude or opinion; a phenomenon called ‘group polarization’. But when some members started posting controversial photos of Mr. Harper, the group demonstrated their ability to moderate itself intelligently. Instead of just removing the pictures, Christopher started a group discussion on how people felt about the photos. “People felt that it was painting us as a fringe group. So we decided to just remove the photos section altogether,” Christopher explained, “The group is very democratic and thankfully people go towards that center and that more moderate ground… It’s amazing to see how that happens without any grand design to it.”
Clearly, Canadians know what they want, and are focused enough to pursue it productively. Christopher attributes the success of the group to a very clear sense of direction. “It’s an issue for fundamental democracy,” Christopher said as he explained the group’s success, “I think the key is to find one key issue, and find a way to present it to the majority of people so that they can agree on it. [Then] find some consensus, and work on very small things and build from there.”
THE PEOPLE’S RESPONSE TO PROROGUING PARLIAMENT
Like all groups rallied around a social media tool, their success at self-organization and self-moderation has been guided by a clear sense of direction. In this case, it was a united response to Mr. Harper’s games to gain a majority government. He was hoping that we wouldn’t be paying attention. But he did not expect that a simple Facebook group could have directed and maintained the spotlight on him, long enough for a majority of Canadians to take notice and start asking questions.
Most people’s initial reaction to the prorogation was anger and frustration. “What upsets Canadians is that it betrays Harper’s campaign and platform of accountability,” Christopher explained, “He said quite clearly early on that he would not appoint Senators, and now he finds himself in a position where, arguably, he will need to in order to move his legislation through.”
What frustrates Christopher the most is that this all seems to be an attempt for Harper to gain a majority government. Mr. Harper just can’t seem to accept the fact that he does not actually represent the will of the majority of Canadians. “He’s in a minority government,” Christopher continued, “and when you’re in a minority government, you have to understand that compromise is necessary. You do not actually have the will of the majority of Canadians.”
Christopher believes that Mr. Harper was counting on our apathy. Everything about the announcement to prorogue parliament just seemed like Harper was trying to bury it. “It was my belief that [Harper] was counting on prorogation to avoid embarrassment on issues such as Afghan detainees,” Christopher said, “Then he was banking on the Olympics happening in February to bolster our sense of pride and nationalism, and that would carry over to him. And then in the throne speech in March, he would throw a poison pill that the opposition parties could not vote on. Then he could say, ‘Look at me, the opposition voted against me. We have to call an election now.’ And then hopefully get into that 40% support, and then get a majority government.”
Even now, some are trying to downplay the issue, like Tony Clement, who has been quoted as saying that this was only a concern of the elite and ‘chattering class’. “To dismiss people that disagree with him as elitist, is completely disrespectful, and shows that he’s out of touch of what’s in the hearts and minds of Canadians,” Christopher responded.
But with Facebook groups like Canadians Against Proroguing Parliament, Canadians have been able to make their voices heard and find thousands of other Canadians across the country that also have the same concerns. “I see the Facebook group as an extension of the general sentiments of the majority of Canadians,” Christopher said. Indeed, for many people, it has become a political awakening, as even those who do not regularly follow politics have joined the group just so that they can learn more.
“The goal of this group was to keep the heat on Mr. Harper,” Christopher explained. By getting people to do something as simple as spending two minutes to write to their MP, they could keep the pressure on Mr. Harper, and prevent his popularity from increasing. Indeed, although it’s only been a couple of weeks, more and more Canadians are aware of prorogation, and the Conservative support has dropped 10 points since October. If Mr. Harper were to try to hold an election now, he would not be successful at winning a majority government. “[Harper] will have to be responsible and responsive to what we’re asking.”
“WE ARE ALL STEWARDS OF INFORMATION NOW”
The Facebook groups were like a spotlight that kept the heat on Mr. Harper. And even though many Canadians seriously are concerned about it, their voices would never have been heard if it weren’t for the Facebook group. “There would have been a bit of murmuring. But that would’ve been from editorial lists and pundits,” Christopher admitted. Consequently, the issue would have disappeared as people stopped paying attention to it. But the Facebook group continues to focus our attention on the issue. The success of social media in the endeavour for social causes is its ability to take your voice and amplify it. “It really has democratized media,” Chirstopher agrees, “We’re all stewards of information now, and it’s really exciting to see that.”
[photo credit: Canadians Against Proroguing Parliament]