Young Offenders – Getting tough is part of the problem, NOT the solution
I am concerned that the majority of Canadians have been misinformed about the rehabilitation and deterrence of young offenders. Many Canadians still support “tough on crime” strategies (an increase in tougher laws and longer minimum sentences) even though criminologists, sociologists, psychologists, clinical psychologists, those who work with young offenders, those who work at rehabilitation centers, etc., have found getting “tough on crime” in order to make an example of those who commit violent crimes does NOT serve as a deterrent. In fact, it has been found that this strategy only serves to increase rates of crime and violence.
Largely, I blame the media which often pushes for tougher sentences for young offenders and is capable of increasing support for this argument by making crime seem more prevalent and brutal than it is though over-reporting of violent atypical crimes. Studies such as the Corrections and Conditional Release Statistical Overview from 2006 however shows violent crime has actually been steady since approximately 1991 and in fact the total number of offenses committed by young individuals are at the lowest they’ve been since 1986. Furthermore, property offenses are actually the most frequently recorded offenses committed by youth and have also seen a reduction. From 2003-2004 homicide and related offences accounted for only 0.06% of all youth cases, sexual assault 2.3% and major assault 6.7%.
Even if violent offenses committed by youth increase, tougher sentences will not be a deterrent. Implementing such a crime strategy would mean we are adopting methods from the United States which will not benefit Canada. With 714 people being incarcerated for every 100,000, the US has the highest incarceration rate of all the Western European Countries; it is blown off the charts with New Zealand in second place with only 168 per 100,000. What’s worse is, after all of this, the US has still not been able to reduce rates of crime.
Incarcerating youth for longer periods of time will not help rehabilitate them, it will only tell them they’ve done something wrong and society will punish them for it. Although some may argue this is the impression we want to leave, it doesn’t help situations. Most youth know murder and assault (violent and sexual), etc. is not acceptable. Those few who do not fully understand this may have mental illnesses preventing them from seeing reason (making punishment useless), or they could have been abused at a younger age, growing up to believe these things to be common practice or acceptable in certain situations. Abuse can alter an individual, it can cause them to lash out or seek refuge in those who influence them the wrong way, or turn to drugs which are often found to be a contributor to violent crimes. When individuals respond to young offenders with violence and disrespect, they will return the favour.
This being said, getting “tough on crime” is not the answer it is just a part of the problem which a large portion of us buy into because of fear and the desire for vengeance. Even publishing the names of those individuals who have been convicted for violent offenses will only hurt their chances of being rehabilitated. Who will hire or trust those individuals enough to give them a second chance after their names and faces have been flashed across every media outlet in the country? How will they be able to start over? How will they get a job or an education or a home? Where will they turn when they are trying to change their life? Try to get on the right track when no one will give you a chance. A return to a life of crime and dependence is inevitable for these individuals.
If Canadians want to fight crime they need to fight it at the start by providing help to troubled and at-risk youth. Studies have shown that individuals (youth in particular) benefit dramatically from programs provided in the community. The Compendium 2000 on Effective Correctional Programming argues programs for youth delivered in the community proved more success than those given in custody. Other studies have argued the same for cognitively based programs delivered in the community. As youth are influenced by family, peers, and the environment they need direction on how to make pro-social choices in the real world, otherwise they will be unsuccessful when faced with making these decisions.
In the end if you believe crime could affect you or your loved ones I urge you to do the research I have suggested is out there, and do it with an open mind. One should never blindly accept anything someone says, but after a critical look, if the research adds up, and is consistent the majority of the time…sometimes it’s a good idea to trust it in spite of your fears and doubts.



27. May, 2010 










